Internal Grants

We invite proposals for the following internal grant programs:

  • Research and Artistry
  • RAPID Internal Funding Program

Research and Artistry

Research and Artistry is an annual internal grant program supporting faculty research, scholarship and artistry activities. Applications are due in the fall and awards are made in the spring. The process is competitive and applications are reviewed by a faculty committee.

Proposals are invited from NIU faculty to support research, scholarship and artistry activities in all academic areas. This support reflects the university's commitment to investing resources in faculty research, scholarly and creative activities.

Proposals will be accepted in two categories.

Grant Categories

The Opportunity Grant supports research, scholarly and creative activities with the potential to attract future external funding. Submissions may propose investing in the success of an established program, as well as supporting new projects through funding for a pilot project, establishing or enhancing partnerships, or other activities that significantly advance the University's scholarly enterprise. Because Opportunity Grants intend to seed future externally funded activity, applicants should clearly demonstrate the potential of their project to lead to external funding.

The Facilitation Grant provides support for high-quality, impactful research, scholarly and creative activities for which extramural support is not feasible or for which external funding has proven inadequate or become unavailable. Such proposals may be submitted by faculty members working in areas where external funding is limited or proposing activities for which external funding is not readily available. The category is also appropriate for a scholarly activity for which external grants have lapsed or funding has been inadequate. Applicants should demonstrate a lack of available external funding.

Contacts

For questions about the proposal process, including review, contact resart@niu.edu.

For questions about or support for InfoReady technical questions or problems, contact erahelp@niu.edu

For questions about a current award, contact Dawn Crawford at dcrawford@niu.edu

Important Dates

  • Submission deadline: Nov. 20, 2024, 4:30 p.m. CST
  • Review period: Nov. 21, 2024 – Feb. 28, 2025
  • Award period: May 16, 2025 – June 30, 2027

Updates and Clarifications for the 2024-2025 Competition

The review factors used to evaluate Research and Artistry applications have been updated to better reflect the goals of the program and better align with application requirements. The new criteria are listed in a crosswalk between review criteria and application sections on this page.

The award period has been changed to allow up to two years for full completion of the project. The award cycle for this 2025 competition will start May 16, 2025 and end June 30, 2027. This change was made to allow time for start-up activities, report generation and unexpected delays and thereby reduce the need for no-cost extensions. Applicants should propose one-year projects. No-cost extension requests will not be accepted for 2025 awards and beyond. Individuals completing 2024 awards scheduled to end June 30, 2025 may request one no-cost extension via the InfoReady portal if needed.

The maximum budget for all projects is now $15,000 irrespective of grant category (Facilitation or Opportunity).

The faculty summer salary maximum allowance is increased from $4,500 to $5,000 per faculty member. Other restrictions on salary apply; please see complete budget guidelines for details.

Eligibility

Tenure-track faculty members who have not received Research and Artistry funding for the past two award cycles are invited to apply. Complete eligibility details:

  • The lead PI of a Research and Artistry application and award must have a tenure-track teaching or research faculty appointment during the application and award periods (2024-2027). Both untenured and tenured faculty are eligible to apply.
  • Individuals who have received or held Research and Artistry awards for either of the past two consecutive award cycles, including new awards and extensions of previously issued awards, are not eligible to apply.
  • Collaborative proposals will be accepted, including submissions from different units/departments/colleges. Such proposals must identify a lead PI who meets the eligibility criteria outlined here. Collaborating investigators may have tenure-track faculty appointments or other types of institutional appointments but must be employees of NIU. Collaborative proposals will be assigned a single score.
  • An individual can be the lead/contact PI on no more than one proposal and a key participant on no more than two proposals (regardless of category).

Proposal Submission

Proposals must be submitted via NIU's InfoReady portal by 4:30 p.m. CST on November 20, 2024.

NIU users should log in to InfoReady via single sign-on using the "NIU Login" button on the NIU InfoReady home page and click on the Research and Artistry 2025 competition title hyperlink to start a proposal. (Please note that InfoReady times out after 180 minutes of inactivity. A temporary pop-up message is generated but may be missed if you are away from your desk. It is possible to click the "submit" button when logged out, which results in a failed submission. Be sure to save your draft application often to avoid loss of work.

Proposals received after the deadline will not be accepted for review. Proposals submitted on time but that are incomplete or otherwise non-compliant may be returned without review. Proposals not submitted via the InfoReady portal will not be accepted for review.

Support documents and videos for applicants are available via the "Help" link on the NIU InfoReady webpage. For technical assistance with the InfoReady submission process, send an email to erahelp@niu.edu and reference "Research and Artistry 2024-2025" in the subject line. Technical support for proposal development and submission in the InfoReady portal is not available outside of business hours. Please note: Applicants should prepare and submit proposals well ahead of the deadline to ensure adequate time to address any technical issues that may arise.

For questions about eligibility, proposal guidelines, or proposal content, send an email to resart@niu.edu.

The submission process is completely electronic. Proposals submitted by any method other than the InfoReady portal will not be accepted.

Application Documents and Requirements

Please follow the instructions below in developing proposal documents.

To ensure uniformity across the university, the submitted proposal should adhere to the content requirements detailed below. Proposals that do not follow the requirements described below will not be evaluated.

We strongly advise applicants to attend to general grantsmanship and readability when writing the narrative sections of their proposals. While grammar, spelling and readability are not explicit review criteria, it is difficult to judge the merit of proposals that are poorly written or contain grammatical or spelling errors. Such proposals do not fare well during the review.

Applicants should also write their proposals in language understandable to non-experts. We strongly advise avoiding the overuse of jargon and highly technical language in narrative documents. Reviewers are selected from a broad array of disciplines and may not be experts in the applicant's domain. A successful proposal must be accessible to all reviewers. Proposals containing language that is not accessible to non-experts fare poorly during review.

Appendices are not allowed, nor are any other documents not specifically listed in the requested or allowed sections of the guidelines. If additional documentation/information is submitted, it will be removed, or the proposal rejected.

Please include a glossary of abbreviations used in your proposal, if any. The InfoReady application portal provides two options for providing a glossary: a text field (type the glossary in directly or paste text developed outside the system), or a document upload field.

Provide a summary of the project not exceeding 1,600 characters. This character limit is built into the InfoReady application form and will be enforced. You may develop your summary outside of the portal and paste it into the text field.

The summary should be a self-contained description of the activities that will be completed if the proposal is funded. The summary should include a statement of objectives, a description of the methods that will be employed and/or activities that will take place and an explanation of how the project will impact the applicant, the University, the discipline and society.

The proposal narrative should communicate all aspects of the applicant's plan. You will develop your proposal narrative outside of InfoReady and upload it to your application as an attachment. The proposal narrative (excluding references cited and glossary) is limited to five single-spaced pages with one-inch margins in all directions and font size no smaller than 11 points. Please work within this limit to determine the appropriate length for each section below based on the content required for your specific proposal. Proposals that exceed this overall page limit will not fare well during review at best and at worst may be returned without review.

The proposal narrative should include the following sections:

Grant Justification

This section should describe how the application qualifies as an opportunity or a facilitation proposal.

For opportunity proposals:

  • Explain how the proposed activity will better position the PI (team) and their eventual work for external funding.
  • Explain specific plans to apply for external funding, including sponsors/programs that may fund the work and how the proposed project aligns with those programs, a timeline for pursuing extramural funding and other details.
  • Describe previous attempts to secure external funding, including whether reviews of previously submitted external proposals justify the need for the proposed activities and/or internal funding in support of a stronger application, or explain the absence of prior external funding applications.

For facilitation proposals:

  • Describe limitations on external funding opportunities relevant to the field, discipline, or type of activity.
  • Explain why external funding support is not feasible or is inadequate for the project to be conducted or has become unavailable and/or how the grant, if awarded, will support the completion of a previously funded project (i.e., because funding was insufficient, to follow up on an unexpected but interesting finding, or other circumstances).
  • Prior attempts to secure extramural funding may be described if applicable and relevant, although it is not necessary.
Project Goals
  • This section should clearly state the project goals and objectives (hypotheses to be tested, questions to be answered, concepts to be explored and/or products that will result from the project) and how those relate to prior work in the field by the applicant and others.
  • Articulate the project need and why it is important and how it will positively impact the PI's (PI team's) career(s), NIU, the region, state, country, or world.
  • Describe how the project proposed, if successful, will be continued and lead to future projects.
Project Methods
  • Define the methods that will be used and activities that will be conducted to achieve the project goals and to evaluate project impacts, irrespective of whether the field is artistic, scientific, or humanistic. This section should convince reviewers that the project is feasible and achievable.
  • Please include a justification and explanation of sample sizes, where applicable.
  • Clarify how the activities will be completed in the time available. Applicants should propose one-year projects and allow sufficient time for project start-up and reporting within the available two-year time period.
PI/Project Team Qualifications
  • This section should convince reviewers that the PI and project team are qualified to conduct the proposed activities.
  • Describe the project team including PI, co-PI(s), students (graduate and/or undergraduate) and other team members and team member roles and responsibilities and qualifications.
  • Describe the connection of this project with the applicant's(s') program(s) of research, scholarship, or artistry.
  • The description should clarify how the proposed work builds on successful work already carried out by the applicant(s). If the proposed work is in a new area, the proposal should explain the motivation for the change in direction and plans to ensure success.
Dissemination
  • Describe a plan for dissemination of project results. The vehicles employed for sharing the work product will depend on the nature of the project and may include but are not limited to exhibitions, performances, presentations, journal articles, books, websites, or podcasts.
  • Include information on how the dissemination plan will support project impact.

Provide a list of references cited in the proposal narrative or elsewhere in the application documents. Applicants may use the citation method most appropriate for their field, as long as the citation method is consistent throughout the application.

Provide an itemized budget request and detailed justification. Applicants must download an Excel budget form from InfoReady, complete it offline and upload the completed form to their application. Applicants may also download and complete a budget justification template if desired or may provide their own justification document. The forms are available for download once an application is started in InfoReady.

The total budget requested may not exceed $15,000 – including summer salary. Funds may not be spent before the award start date or after the award end date. Funds may not be used for activities that occur before the award start date or after the award end date. Funding is limited to the following categories:

  • Faculty summer salary of up to $5,000. Faculty may only request summer salary on one proposal up to this limit, even if they participate in more than one proposal
  • Graduate assistant salary
  • Undergraduate assistant salary
  • Supplies (including consumables and minor equipment)
  • Travel required to conduct the research, scholarly, or creative activities proposed in the application (travel related to the project methodology
    • e.g., for data collection, collaborative activities, field research, access or archives, etc.).
    • Applicants requesting travel support to meet with collaborators should justify the need for in-person vs virtual meetings.
    • Note that conference travel/registration is not allowed
  • Publication costs
  • Fees for use of established NIU service centers (i.e., MAC lab, stable isotope lab, RMS). More information is available on these service centers
  • Contractual services (e.g., transcription, lab analysis, access to research facilities, etc.)
    • Note that payment for contractual services to an external organization may only be requested if the service is not available via NIU
  • Participant payments

Applicants are strongly encouraged to work with their departments to ensure student pay is appropriately calculated and requested and incorporates anticipated pay increases, etc.

Budget items other than those listed above are not allowed. Specifically, the following requests are unallowable:

  • Costs incurred for activities taking place before the award start date or after the award end date.
  • Faculty summer salary exceeding $5,000 per faculty member. Faculty may request summer salary in only one proposal.
  • Other employee salary requests (e.g., additional pay or release time for faculty during the academic year or non-faculty employees).
  • Any costs (travel, lodging, meals, registration, or any other cost) in support of conference attendance, including for presentation of project results.
  • Costs of collaboration with external entities: Funding to external entities is limited to contractual payments to another organization for services not available at NIU (e.g., transcription, lab analyses that cannot be conducted at NIU, access to facilities required but not available at NIU, etc.). Direct payments to individuals are not allowed, nor are consortium arrangements with another organization to conduct a portion of the work (i.e., a sub-award).

If the budget of a proposal selected for the award includes unallowable items, those unallowable costs will be removed from the awarded budget and the total award amount reduced accordingly. Awardees will not have the opportunity to negotiate or revise their budgets.

Your budget should not include fringe benefit costs, student tuition, or facilities and administrative costs. These costs are requested in budgets of externally funded grants and contracts to recover institutional costs associated with those projects. Because Research and Artistry is an intramurally funded program, recovery of these institutional costs is not applicable.

You must provide a detailed budget justification in addition to the budget form. The justification should directly tie the budget request to the work plan of the proposed project and explain how the budget request will provide sufficient resources to complete the project. The justification must include the following information:

  • Why each item requested in the budget is required to complete the project
  • How each item requested will support the proposed project
  • The cost basis for and total cost of each item requested, in dollars (e.g., "X widgets x $Y per widget = $Z total"; "X amount of time x $Y per time unit = $Z total salary/wage request")

Budget items that are not adequately justified will not be awarded.

Award funds must be expended between May 16, 2025 and June 30, 2027. Funds may not be spent before or for activities occurring before the award start date. Extensions of the award end date are not allowed.

Abbreviated CV
  • Required for all proposals for each PI/Co-PI.
  • The abbreviated CV should emphasize publications and professional activities (e.g., books, book chapters, proceedings, refereed articles, monographs, presentations, exhibits, performances, inventions,) during the last five years.
  • This document is limited to five pages.
History of Prior Support from the Research and Artistry Program
  • Required for all proposals for each PI/Co-PI.
  • Provide a list of previous Research and Artistry proposals and awards including project title, amount, dates of support and whether it was funded or not funded.
  • For each award, indicate how the results of the supported research, scholarly and creative activities were disseminated.
  • If you have no history with the Research and Artistry program, you must upload a document stating as much.
Extramural Funding (Past Three Years)
  • Required for opportunity proposals for each PI/Co-PI
  • Optional for facilitation proposals
  • Provide a list of all extramural proposals submitted during the last three years, whether funded, unfunded, or pending decision.
  • You may retrieve a list of proposals submitted via Sponsored Programs Administration from the InfoEd database by accessing the Standard Reports or draft your list.
  • At a minimum, the report should include the lead PI name and institution, your role on the project, the sponsor, the project title, the requested/awarded amount, the requested/awarded project period and the status of the proposal.
Internal Funding History
  • Optional for all proposals
  • A list or description of internal funding other than Research and Artistry support you have requested or been awarded to support the proposed project.
Additional Efforts to Obtain Support
  • Optional for all proposals
  • A description of any additional efforts you have made to obtain resources in support of the proposed project.
Letters of Collaboration
  • Optional for all proposals
  • If external collaborators are involved, you may provide letters of collaboration confirming their intention to participate.
    • Such letters must only document the commitment to collaborate in brief terms. The letter should include the collaborator's name, institution/organization (if affiliated) and a statement of agreement to provide a specific contribution (i.e., task to be completed, knowledge to be provided).
    • Collaboration letters must not describe qualitative support for the project.
  • Letters of support that praise the project idea or PI(s) are not allowed and will not be removed from the proposal before review.

Evaluation Process

Proposals will be reviewed and scored by members of the Research and Artistry Selection Committee. The Research and Artistry Selection Committee will evaluate submitted proposals in the context of the program-specific criteria to develop scores and formulate funding recommendations. Scores may be adjusted based on committee discussion of a proposal if warranted. The review criteria are as follows:

Criterion Description Application Section(s)
Potential impact

For Opportunity grants, does the proposed activity better position the applicant to secure external funding? Are external funding opportunities sufficiently identified in the proposal and the proposed project adequately linked to them? Do the activities of the proposed project clearly align with the identified funding program?

For Facilitation grants, is an argument sufficiently made that external funding to support the proposed activities is lacking?

For all proposals, will the proposed project result in research, scholarship, or creative artistry that positively impacts the applicant's career, NIU, the region, state, country and/or world?

  • Project summary
  • Proposal narrative:
    • Opportunity/facilitation grant justification
    • Project goals
    • Dissemination
  • Additional documentation:
    • Extramural funding
    • Internal funding history
    • Additional efforts to obtain support

Goals/specific aims

To what degree are the goals of the project clearly identified and understandable? To what extent are the goals/aims of the project compelling and novel?
  • Proposal summary
  • Proposal narrative:
    • Project Goals

Approach

How likely is the project to succeed?

Does the proposed approach to executing the project align with the stated project goals? Can the project be completed in the time available? Are the proposed activities feasible and achievable? Is the project management plan sufficient? Does the requested budget align with and adequately support the planned activities?

  • Proposal summary
  • Proposal narrative:
    • Project methods
  • Budget and justification
  • Additional documentation:
    • Letters of collaboration (if applicable)

PI/PI team

How well do(es) the PI's (team's) qualifications align with the proposed project goals and activities? Do(es) the applicant's(s') prior training, previous accomplishments and experience align with the proposed project?

  • Proposal summary
  • Proposal narrative:
    • PI and project team qualifications
  • Additional documentation:
    • Abbreviated CV(s)

Final Selection and Budgets

The director of research development in consultation with the associate vice president for research and innovation partnerships (AVP-RIPS) will make final selections based on selection committee rankings and recommendations and balancing of categories and disciplines. The budgets and budget justifications of the selected proposals will be reviewed and adjusted (if necessary) by the director of research development. Once awards are finalized, the RIPS business office will offer one or more webinars to awardees and their designated business managers to explain award and expenditure procedures. Attendance at the webinar(s) and formal acceptance of award terms are required before award funds will be released.

RAPID Internal Funding Program FY26

RAPID is an internal grant program that will be ongoing throughout FY26. RAPID offers time-sensitive and bridge funding for tenure-track and tenured NIU faculty whose research, scholarship and creative activities have been interrupted due to shifting external funding landscapes or who otherwise have time-sensitive opportunities to advance their research, scholarly and creative activities. The purpose of the awards is to assist faculty in being competitive for external funding mechanisms, including as they pivot to new corporate, foundation and governmental opportunities. Awards up to $5,000 will be considered.

Please address questions to ord@niu.edu.

Eligibility

Tenure-track and tenured NIU faculty are eligible. Faculty who have start-up, PI indirect fund distribution, or Research & Artistry Grants are not eligible for RAPID funds. A strong case for need of additional funds must be made if a faculty member has other existing internal or external research, scholarship, or creative grants. A faculty member may be a PI of only one RAPID proposal or award at a time.

Outcomes

In addition to research, scholarly, or creative objectives, proposals should identify a specific target external funding mechanism (such as corporate, foundation and governmental), as well as at least one external outlet where project results will be submitted for dissemination (as relevant to the field, publication, presentation, performance, display, etc.). Submissions of external funding proposals and for dissemination should occur within one year of RAPID project completion. Documentation of submissions will be required with final reports.

Development

Faculty are encouraged to reach out to the Office of Research Development (ORD) research development specialist (RDS) for assistance in identifying a well-aligned external funding mechanism for their project outcomes, including if the faculty member's traditional funding mechanism is no longer available. The RDS will coordinate with partners in NIU Corporate and Foundation Relations and Office of Innovation to complement ORD expertise in federal, state and private funding opportunities. Faculty may contact their assigned RDS directly (if known), or email ord@niu.edu or submit a consultation request to find out who their assigned RDS is.

Resubmissions

Resubmissions will be accepted after administrative screening to confirm full responsiveness to prior reviews. Resubmissions that have not been fully responsive will be returned with comments. PIs are encouraged to schedule a meeting with their ORD research development specialist to discuss their reviews and to address comments.

Budget and Project Period

Applicants may request up to $5,000. A maximum one-year award period will be allowed.

Awards may be used to pay for:

  • Graduate assistant stipend salary (excluding fringe and tuition, which are university-covered on internal grants)
  • Undergraduate or graduate assistant student worker hourly salary (excluding fringe benefits, which are university-covered on internal grants)
  • Software
  • Supplies (including consumables and minor equipment)
  • Fees for use of established NIU service centers (e.g., MAC lab, stable isotope lab)
  • Payments to research ("human subjects") participants
  • Participants in a project activity not defined as human subjects
  • Travel for data collection

Awards may not be used to pay for:

  • Travel for purposes other than data collection (including conferences and meetings)
  • Open access publication fees
  • Salaries of faculty or staff
  • Equipment/instrumentation (federally defined)
  • Payments for services or salaries to collaborators, contractors, or vendors outside of NIU

Fringe benefits, tuition and facilities and administrative costs are institutional expenses covered by NIU on internal grants and should not be included in the budget.

Depending on reviews and on the numbers of proposals and funding constraints, awards may be for a portion of the requested amount.

Time extensions for RAPID awards will not be considered. Budget revisions must be strongly justified and will be carefully scrutinized.

Reviews

Requests will be reviewed by two NIU faculty members. RIPS leadership will make funding decisions. Review criteria will include:

  • Strength of the research, scholarly, or creative objectives' significance, aims/objectives and approach.
  • Alignment of the requested budget categories with the project aims/objectives and approach.
  • Strength of justification of the time-sensitive or bridge need to increase competitiveness for future external funding.
  • Identification of a well-aligned external funding opportunity supported by the project.
  • Identification of well-aligned outlets for dissemination.

Application Process

Applications may be submitted at any time. Decisions will be made about a month after submission. Prior to sending a proposal out for review, RIPS staff and the appropriate associate dean for research in the faculty member's college will be consulted to confirm eligibility in relation to existing funding.

Reporting

Recipients will be required to submit an expenditures report and a final report. Shortly after the project end date, the PI will work with their local grants' administrator and RIPS financial director to prepare the expenditures report that documents expenditures as well as reporting what was accomplished. The final report will be due one year after the expenditures report and will include documentation on external funding and dissemination submissions. The expenditures and final reporting dates will be listed in award notices. Timely completion of project objectives, timely expenditures aligned with budgets and submission of reports will be considered in funding decisions related to future internal RIPS-funded grant submissions.

Contact Us

If you do not find an answer to your question in the FAQ, you may contact the emails listed below with questions about your research and artistry proposal or award.

Proposal and overall program contact: resart@niu.edu for questions about proposal requirements including RFP clarifications, opportunity vs. facilitation proposal categories, eligibility requirements, budget restrictions/allowances or other miscellaneous questions.

Technical contact: erahelp@niu.edu for questions about the InfoEd submission portal or troubleshooting assistance. Please reference "research and artistry" in the email subject line.

Post-award management: dcrawford@niu.edu for questions about award management guidance and requirements described in your award letter or other questions specific to a current award.